Reality, science and science gravedigger

All facts points to that reality is a duality. Dualities, however, similar to everything else, come in two differently inclusive varieties – kinds and kinds of kinds, or differences and differences in similarities. One duality that includes another duality. The former can be called “contextual duality” and the latter “contentual duality”.

An example of a contextual duality is that electromagnetism in the part of visible light can be mapped in both a square and a cylindrical context.

Color_cube1Color_cylinder

An example of a contentual duality is that an electromagnetic wave can be illustrated in two aspects: time and frequency.

time_frequency

So, how shall we understand this our reality? Well, the fundamental problem is that reality thus is either ambiguous or (paradoxically) contradictory – ambiguous if we accept facts (ie, the description above) and contradictory if we don’t accept facts (ie, the description above).

Cladistics and particle physics do not accept the facts above. This “denial of facts” approach did thus emerge within “science”, but has today also spread out to more general populists. Trump supporters have even baptized it to “alternative facts”. Cladistics and particle physics have thus dug the grave for empirical science.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s