The problem for rationality is the concept “boundary”. A boundary is in one aspect (as an assumption) an ambiguity and in the orthogonal aspect (as a deduction) a paradoxical contradiction. The concept is thus an intermediary between “assumption” and “deduction”. It means that not all of these three notions of the concept can be consistent at the same time. And, thus, if we accept assumption and deduction, which we have to, we have to deny the concept “boundary”. This is also what we do in ZFC (ie, the fundament of mathematics).
- Cladism can’t find a consistent solution on any problem, because it is inconsistent
- On the difference between illustration and representation
- Is there “a tree of life” or not?
- On the fundamental problem whether classes are real or not
- On the difference between science and populism
- On the cladistic belief
- On the free will
- On the origin of speech
- On the insurmountable gap between reality and our discussion about it
- On the notion of a single truth
- On the problem with reality
- On classification, and Linné’s solution of its inherent inconsistency
- How shall we handle the impossibility to understand reality?
- Reality is nothing but an illusion
- On the problem with principles
The finding of Higgs… on Have particle physicists actua… relation101 on Can we understand what reality… menvall on The difference between Linnean… Gerald on The difference between Linnean… The finding of Higgs… on The finding of Higgs particle…