Science talks about itself in terms of updating conclusions within a paradigm or updating the paradigm. In a modern context, however, these two processes are nothing but updating versions or kinds, like 2.1 to 2.2 or 2 to 3. The idea is that it will sooner or later arrive to a final version. So, will it? I argue that it can’t, but what do you think (or understand).
- Cladism can’t find a consistent solution on any problem, because it is inconsistent
- On the difference between illustration and representation
- Is there “a tree of life” or not?
- On the fundamental problem whether classes are real or not
- On the difference between science and populism
- On the cladistic belief
- On the free will
- On the origin of speech
- On the insurmountable gap between reality and our discussion about it
- On the notion of a single truth
- On the problem with reality
- On classification, and Linné’s solution of its inherent inconsistency
- How shall we handle the impossibility to understand reality?
- Reality is nothing but an illusion
- On the problem with principles
The finding of Higgs… on Have particle physicists actua… relation101 on Can we understand what reality… menvall on The difference between Linnean… Gerald on The difference between Linnean… The finding of Higgs… on The finding of Higgs particle…