“The truth” is a running point

If there is a truth, then it must be the end of logical reasoning. The problem with this fact is that logical reasoning has two entrances: assuming that kinds are real and assuming that kinds aren’t real, whereof the former ends in double contradiction (ie, both in time and over time) and the latter ends in ambiguity. This problem means that “the truth” is an interface between double contradiction and ambiguity. “The truth” is thus nothing but a turnover from double contradiction to ambiguity or the other way around. It is a running point in either of two possible directions.

It means that cladistics can’t find “the tree of Life” and that particle physics can’t find a consistent system to describe reality (like “the standard model”). There simply aren’t such things.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s