On what the world is

When we (humanity) divided the world with words, we got an empty middle within words instead of the world.

What this empty middle is, depends on whether we believe we have invented or found words. If we believe we have invented words, then the empty middle is an uncertainty (where the probability is 1), whereas if we believe we have found words, then the empty middle is a paradox like the “Higgs particle” of particle physics.

None if these possibilities does thus exist outside of words,  but are instead both merely products of our division of the world with words. However, since only the former agree with this fact, only it is consistent with the world outside of words. Only the belief that we have invented words is thus consistent with the world outside of words.

This conclusion is as far as we can come to an understanding of what the world outside of words IS. We can, however, reach a total understanding of HOW the world FUNCTIONS by mathematics.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s