On the fundamental problem with speech

When we (humans) invent speech and thereby partition reality into things and kinds of things, we at the same time give rise to a fundamental paradoxical contradiction.

The paradoxical contradiction is that the things of reality have to be finite if reality is finite (which is the only rational assumption) by meaning that there then logically are two non-finite kinds of kinds: one that is empty and one that is infinite, which are logically identical, and which also are logically identical to single thing. A single thing is thus logically also both an empty kind and an infinite kind. This paradoxical contradiction is called Russell’s paradox.

This fundamental paradoxical contradiction (ie, Russell’s paradox) thus means that singularities are logically false (ie, paradoxically contradictory) if reality is finite, which thus is the only rational assumption. We thus appear to be trapped in an eternal paradoxical carousel in search for a single truth that isn’t to be found, independently of whether we are consistent (ie, assuming that things are real) or inconsistent (ie, assuming that kinds are real). However, if we start from logic itself, then we can bypass this paradoxical contradiction by deriving the consistent approach (ie, that things are real) via the inconsistent approach (ie, that kinds are real), by erroneously assuming that the single thing (ie, Russell’s paradox) is real (ie, ZFC), and can thereby be totally consistent.

What this route to total consistency says about reality is nothing. It just explains “The Axiom of Choice”.




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s