There isn’t any single unambiguous reality (contrary to what realists like cladists and particle physicists claim)

Reality has two aspects: one continuous and one discrete.

Logical reasoning starting from the continuous aspect ultimately ends in paradoxical contradiction (ie, Russell’s paradox), which also is the ultimate Truth of logical reasoning starting from the discrete aspect. The ultimate ends of logical reasoning starting from both these aspects are thus one and the same paradox, although arriving to it in different aspects.

It means that reality is fundamentally ambiguous between its two aspects, and that there thus isn’t any single unambiguous reality at all (as nominalists like quantum mechanics say, but contrary to what realists like cladists and particle physicists both believe, claim and even claim to have proved empirically).

There isn’t any single unambiguous reality at all, if for no other reason, then for the simple reason that if there had been one, then the two aspects of reality would have been one and the same aspect. Instead, the mere idea of a single unambiguous reality is a contradiction in words.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s